How one health care center re-evaluated its growth priorities and selected M&A targets
EY-Parthenon helped a New England-based academic medical system evaluate strategic opportunities for expansion and growth. The work included prioritizing settings of care by identifying both current capabilities and potential new ones.
The medical system was able to identify three to five priority settings after analyzing the payer mix, stand-alone unit economics, reimbursement outlook and value to the system from each.
Category-specific selection criteria were then identified for targets. The best selection criteria for each category was determined, with current market guidance from the system’s leadership team factored in. Targets were chosen and value cases helped enable revenue realization. The value cases included geographic analysis and a look at how expansion can be realized to enhance value to the system, including ability to address specific concerns about keeping patients in network.
The result was that the system moved forward with an acquisition that fit the appropriate goals.
Kate Elfers, Shivam Jaitly and Navneet Dagar contributed to this article.
Summary
Many hospitals can benefit from M&A as they simultaneously try to offer patients different access to care, try to increase their negotiating ability with consolidated payers, and deal with new competitors from outside of traditional provider networks.
But M&A is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Hospital executives need to decide what they want to get out of a deal and which types of M&A will help them realize those strategic goals.